Archaeomagnetic dating sites

These features will provide good radiocarbon dating records, alongside the archaeomagnetic signatures for the fired subsoils within and below them.

archaeomagnetic dating sites-15

This offers the perfect opportunity for archaeomagnetic studies.

For those that aren’t quite sure what this odd science (magic) is, you are welcome to peruse my website, which is listed at the end of this blog post, for some answers.

This previous study, and others since, have identified the need for further work to be undertaken. My main aim is to improve our understanding of geomagnetic field change during prehistoric periods, but particularly the Neolithic.

At the Bradford Kaims this season, I sampled two features associated with the Bronze Age burnt mounds, both of them interpreted as fire pits containing fired stones, burnt sediments, ash, and charcoal.

All date options are reported to the archaeologist, then makes a decision as to which best matches the other data from the site (Sternberg 1982, Eighmy 1990).

In contemporaneity studies, or relative dating, sample VGPs are compared to each other to determine whether they are statistically different at the 5% significance level.

Unlike radiocarbon or, in some cases, even tree rings, the data recovered from an archaeomagnetic sample directly refer to a specific cultural event of archaeological interest (Dean 1978).

Thus, an archaeomagnetic sample, in theory, should more accurately date the target event than other dating sources (Wolfman 1990a:346).

In the statistical method of sample dating (Sternberg 1982; Sternberg and Mc Guire 1990), the data from an archaeomagnetic sample are compared to to the mean VGPs of a statistically-created curve.

Tags: , ,